Add the sphinx-codeautolink extension to doc build process?

[cmarqu (Colin Marquardt)]

@AA-Turner

Yes, but I would expect to be able to use the extension without any such ‘skip’ directives — it should be robust enough to handle failures to parse (if so configured).

Oh, it already is robust. The one RecursionError has been fixed, with a release pending.
It will print warnings for parse failures but these can be suppressed.
What is not configurable yet is to not report these warnings in the first place. I’ll open a ticket, assuming such a config option is preferred over using suppress_warnings.