# Addendum for PEP 722 to use TOML **URL:** \ **Category:** Packaging\ **Created:** [August 4, 2023, 6:32am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/addendum-for-pep-722-to-use-toml/30979 "2023-08-04T06:32:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 3
**Author:** ![abravalheri](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/abravalheri/32/4990_2.png) [@abravalheri](https://discuss.python.org/u/abravalheri)\ **Post date:** [August 4, 2023, 11:37am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/addendum-for-pep-722-to-use-toml/30979/3 "2023-08-04T11:37:45Z")
Quoting the [comment on the other thread](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-dependency-specification-for-single-file-scripts/29905/212) for completeness: > [@PEP 722: Dependency specification for single-file scripts](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-722-dependency-specification-for-single-file-scripts/29905/212): > > Regarding the PEP itself, I will note that (not surprisingly!) it directly clashes with a number of the “rejected alternatives” in PEP 722. I’d really rather not post all of the arguments from that PEP into Discourse, just to re-hash old debates, as that will waste a _lot_ of everyone’s time. Can I therefore ask that you respond in your PEP to all of those points (maybe in a big “Rejected Alternatives” section of your own?) as if I had raised them all here. Even if all you want to say is that you don’t agree with the objections raised in PEP 722, then could you do that explicitly so that it’s clear that your position is that the objections I give are simply a matter of opinion that you disagree with? > > Also, could you make it clear in your PEP that the whole “`pyproject.toml` for projects that don’t build into a wheel” discussion is still unresolved, as your PEP rather critically depends on the outcome of that… > > I’ve added a couple more points to the PEP draft as review comments. I know that’s not the ideal place to do so, but until your PEP has a dedicated thread, that seemed like the best approach. --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/addendum-for-pep-722-to-use-toml/30979)._