# Adopting/recommending a toml parser? **URL:** \ **Category:** Packaging\ **Created:** [May 3, 2020, 12:16pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/adopting-recommending-a-toml-parser/4068 "2020-05-03T12:16:40Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 103
**Author:** ![hukkinj1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/hukkinj1/32/4394_2.png) [@hukkinj1](https://discuss.python.org/u/hukkinj1)\ **Post date:** [January 11, 2022, 2:24pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/adopting-recommending-a-toml-parser/4068/103 "2022-01-11T14:24:58Z")
> [@CAM-Gerlach](#): > > As a side note, @hukkinj1 , if this will be an officially blessed and supported project, it might be a good idea to learn from that experience, minimize bus factor and follow responsible practices by ensuring it is GitHub/GitLab/etc org, and has multiple maintainers on PyPI, to avoid a single point of failure I’ve added hauntsaninja and encukou as maintainers on GitHub and PyPI to increase bus factor. * * * An FYI to everyone in this thread: we how have a PEP draft ([PEP 680](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0680/)) and a separate discussion for it in [the PEPs category](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-680-tomllib-support-for-parsing-toml-in-the-standard-library/13040) (thanks @hauntsaninja!). --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/adopting-recommending-a-toml-parser/4068)._