BTW, that was partly tongue-in-cheek, and I should have been clearer about that. In fact it’s a very serious matter with decades of dispute about centuries of history, over which people have even been killed. It came to mind because a share of an older story about it, from India’s English edition of “Financial Express”, popped up in my Facebook “memories”.
The primary dispute stems from that the site had been the location of an Islamic mosque for some centuries, but a mob of over 150,000(!) “Hindu extremists” destroyed the mosque in 1992. “Because” the site is also held to be the birthplace of “Lord Ram”, and Hindus wanted to build a temple on the mosque’s ruins.
And so on. Nothing in India is “simple”. The Supreme Court ruling that gave the Hindus permission to build their new temple ran over a thousand pages long. It’s the most populous country on Earth now, and I have a long-time interest in its vast spectrum of sub-cultures, religions, and politics. I admire India.