[NOTE]
This is a kind of repost. I tried to hide the identity of who I was repying to by editing the quote tag in Markdown to remove the link to the original. Which did what I expected (left no clue in the body of my reply), but I didn’t notice that there was still a link retained by Discourse, showing up in a decoration at the top right of the area outside the post body. That displayed the user’s Discourse handle.
That decoration remained even after the OP deleted their post. And it still remained after a mod stepped in to delete their post “for real”. And it still showed up after I deleted my post. It finally went away when a mod deleted my post “for real” too.
Nothing sinister about any of this. A mod & I cooperated on the common goal of hiding the OP’s identity, which is what the OP wanted too.
Anyway, while it may never come up again, that’s the trick: if you don’t want any trace of who you’re replying to, don’t use any of Discourse’s helpful “reply” features to begin with. Start a reply “by hand” from scratch.
[/NOTE]
And for that reason I’m not quoting you in a way that leaves your online identity visible. You may or may not want to delete your post sooner, before the Internet Wayback Machine captures it. You should also be aware of that copies of your msg may also have been emailed to Discourse users (for example, the system sent a copy to my email address).
David would agree. @Lucas_Malor didn’t copy the entire speech, just the part he cared about. Not long after:
He’s very aware of that he’s making a limited analogy, not at all claiming equivalence.
If that’s not enough for you, please email him yourself. I have enough of a job just trying to explain myself
I don’t have David’s deep academic background in this area, and would not myself have used these words. But I understand why he did, and believe he made it very clear how comparatively trivial Python schisms are.