BTW, offense is in the eye of the offended. And I actually am somewhat offended by that you snipped my later:
A CoC standing against “serious” abuse is 100% fine with me. Less than that and it gets ever dicier.
which made it crystal clear that I was not advocating for a return to Usenet standards, but view the fragment you quoted as a point on a spectrum of possibilities. My initial reply to you should not have been necessary. Setting up a strawman caricature to tear down is a form of rhetorical abuse.
But, no, I do not want a CoC so petty it would allow me to hassle you over that. Usenet is one end of the spectrum; living in a North Korean re-education camp is the other, and I don’t want that either. Did you advocate for a North Korean re-education camp? No - but turnabout is fair play 
.