“Working Group” is a formal term defined by the PSF Bylaws, Article VII.
To form a WG, you need a charter, voting process, and other formalities. These formalities are tricky, and my impression is that several people got burned out trying to do them. (IMO that’s the part Guido refers to by “a bit much into the work of being an organization and not enough into actually documenting stuff”)
The current charter draft is at CPython Documentation Workgroup - Documentation Community documentation and the pain point is writing up the onboarding process (Adding and onboarding new workgroup members - Documentation Community documentation).
If anyone wants to help finalize that, let me know and I can give you pointers. I thought this is where I wanted to help, but then I realized it actually isn’t.
IMO, these formalities are also entirely unnecessary to improve documentation. But using “WG” for something that’s not a formal PSF Working Group would be misleading.
Hence, “Docs Community”. Anyone is free to join, members don’t have any special powers, and so maintaining a member list would (IMO) be a waste of time. It’s more of a set of discussion platforms than an organization, really:
- if you want to stay in the loop and discuss major decisions, follow this category on Discourse
- if you want to hang out and discuss in real time, join the Discord
- if you want to help, hit the GitHub issues (or ask on any of the above)
If you want to formalize, describe and clarify this, please go ahead and send pull requests! Pruning might be as helpful as additions.