DSL Operator – A different approach to DSLs

[dg-pb]

@peterc

I could imagine instead agreeing with the community on a way to communicate to the IDE “this bit of code is a DSL, please highlight it appropriately.”

Yes, this could be useful. We have briefly touched on this in:

• Linked Booleans Logics (rethinking PEP 505) - #12 by dg-pb
• Linked Booleans Logics (rethinking PEP 505) - #21 by dg-pb