Only in the sense that I was pointing out that doing so would involve essentially writing a new language. Which you’re welcome to do, but the Python core developers are not likely to be interested in helping you (I know I’m not).
Only in the sense that I was pointing out that doing so would involve essentially writing a new language. Which you’re welcome to do, but the Python core developers are not likely to be interested in helping you (I know I’m not).
Please, do not steer this discussion further away from the OP’s point. Also, please don’t post so many times about your own ideas and questions in someone else’s discussion.
Even if you think it’s not a problem, it’s behavior that’s not considerate from where I stand.
in stark contrast to languages like Javascript
In Node.js, JavaScript has full access to the local machine, including the file system, network interfaces, and environment variables. In contrast, browser JavaScript runs in a sandbox with restricted access to system resources.
It’s not the language itself that offers sandbox capabilities.
It boils down to the question: ‘Do we need to implement a sandbox when there are plenty of existing implementations?’
It’s not the language itself that offers sandbox capabilities.
Yes, that’s kind of the right point of view. But the question is.
At what level are JS proxy objects implemented there and are there ways to get the source objects, say in V8-based runtime?
But the question is.
At what level are proxy objects implemented there and are there ways to get the source objects, say in V8-based runtime?
Please create another thread in Python Help.
Please create another thread in Python Help.
Please don’t.
@mwr’s previous thread is still open, and has slow mode active for a reason. Further discussion on the same topic should be kept there, or the associated thread in Ideas when it reopens.
Something that might be interesting for some security leaks is Ruby’s trust and taint system