# For your consideration: Proposed bylaws changes to improve our membership experience **URL:** \ **Category:** PSF\ **Created:** [June 13, 2024, 4:06pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/for-your-consideration-proposed-bylaws-changes-to-improve-our-membership-experience/55696 "2024-06-13T16:06:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 20
**Author:** ![tim.one](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/tim.one/32/282_2.png) [@tim.one](https://discuss.python.org/u/tim.one)\ **Post date:** [June 15, 2024, 8:41pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/for-your-consideration-proposed-bylaws-changes-to-improve-our-membership-experience/55696/20 "2024-06-15T20:41:37Z")
> [@thomas](#): > > They can be banned from [discuss.python.org](http://discuss.python.org), or denied access to PyCon US, or removed as a Core Developer, yes. That doesn’t make them no longer a Fellow. Got it - thanks. I read “deal with” as “do something about”, not as “revoke Fellow status forever”. Like David too, I’m not opposed to making it impossible for the Board to do this on its own - I just want a higher bar than a simple majority vote. My years on the Board matched David’s experience: votes were usually unanimous. If there’s reasonable disagreement, under most systems of juistice that favors the accused. --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/for-your-consideration-proposed-bylaws-changes-to-improve-our-membership-experience/55696)._