# macOS version support policy

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/macos-version-support-policy/53715>\
**Category:** Core Development\
**Created:** [May 19, 2024, 12:13pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/macos-version-support-policy/53715 "2024-05-19T12:13:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 20

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![h-vetinari](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/h-vetinari/32/1220_2.png) [@h-vetinari](https://discuss.python.org/u/h-vetinari)\
**Post date:** [January 23, 2026, 1:17pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/macos-version-support-policy/53715/20 "2026-01-23T13:17:06Z")

</div>

> [@jmroot](#):
>
> Did this ever happen?

It never happened AFAICT. I had asked for something along the lines of

> [@h-vetinari](#):
>
> In that case, perhaps PEP 11 needs a distinction based on `#some_rule_regarding_macOS_version`, and someone needs to champion Tier 3 support for whichever versions fall below the cut-off.

to be done in the course of [Proposed PEP 11 update -- policy for unsupported platforms](https://discuss.python.org/t/proposed-pep-11-update-policy-for-unsupported-platforms/104986), but that was deemed off-topic.

As it happens, I recently had to [look at this](https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/2467#issuecomment-3747805458) again, because libc++ v22.1 is raising the minimum deployment target to 11.0, which affects us in conda-forge. Below the fold is the same analysis as above (28 days of downloads for `requests` on osx, split by macOS version).

> ****
>
> | version | downloads | percentage | cumulative | percentage | users \>=version |
> | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
> | 10.1 | 2 | 0.0000% | 2 | 0.0000% | 100.0000% |
> | 10.5 | 7 | 0.0001% | 9 | 0.0001% | 100.0000% |
> | 10.6 | 4 | 0.0001% | 13 | 0.0002% | 99.9999% |
> | 10.7 | 2 | 0.0000% | 15 | 0.0002% | 99.9998% |
> | 10.8 | 3 | 0.0000% | 18 | 0.0002% | 99.9998% |
> | 10.9 | 39 | 0.0005% | 57 | 0.0007% | 99.9998% |
> | 10.10 | 26 | 0.0003% | 83 | 0.0011% | 99.9993% |
> | 10.11 | 65 | 0.0008% | 148 | 0.0019% | 99.9989% |
> | 10.12 | 205 | 0.0026% | 353 | 0.0045% | 99.9981% |
> | 10.13 | 1,319 | 0.0168% | 1,672 | 0.0213% | 99.9955% |
> | 10.14 | 1,470 | 0.0188% | 3,142 | 0.0401% | 99.9787% |
> | 10.15 | 15,094 | 0.19% | 18,236 | 0.23% | 99.96% |
> | 10.16 | 232,838 | 2.97% | 251,074 | 3.20% | 99.77% |
> | 11 | 17,199 | 0.22% | 268,273 | 3.42% | 96.80% |
> | 12 | 92,973 | 1.19% | 361,246 | 4.61% | 96.58% |
> | 13 | 157,024 | 2.00% | 518,270 | 6.61% | 95.39% |
> | 14 | 1,083,349 | 13.82% | 1,601,619 | 20.43% | 93.39% |
> | 15 | 4,118,308 | 52.53% | 5,719,927 | 72.97% | 79.57% |
> | 26 | 1,948,673 | 24.86% | 7,668,600 | 97.82% | 27.03% |
> | 27 | 336 | 0.00% | 7,668,936 | 97.83% | 2.18% |
> | Invalid | 9,095 | 0.12% | 7,678,031 | 97.94% | 2.17% |
> | None | 161,146 | 2.06% | 7,839,177 | 100.00% | 2.06% |
> | Sum | 7,839,177 | 100% | | | |
> 
> Note that 10.16 is a [misreported](https://eclecticlight.co/2020/08/13/macos-version-numbering-isnt-so-simple/) version corresponding to something \>=11.0.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/macos-version-support-policy/53715)._
