PEP 582 - Python local packages directory

[brettcannon]

@frostming

Although PDM began its life as the only package manager to support PEP 582, it is a bit frustrating that people continue to resist adopting it because of the incomplete draft PEP, even though PDM has switched to venv by default after 2.0.

@frostming before Kushal sends this PEP to the SC, did you have any input to provide? Did PDM 2 switch simply because PEP 582 never got accepted and you would happily kept using it if it had (that’s what the PDM 2 post seems to indirectly suggest)? Or was there another reason?