PEP 639, Round 2: Improving license clarity with better package metadata

Packaging Standards
22

That sounds awesome to me. If someone else chimes in with an approval of that new plan I’ll devote time this weekend to updating my implementation of this PEP.

edit: had time today, example usage:

[build-system]
requires = ['hatchling']
build-backend = 'hatchling.build'

[project]
name = 'foo'
license = 'MIT'
dynamic = ['version']

[tool.hatch.version]
path = 'foo/__about__.py'

[tool.hatch.build]
packages = ['foo']

[tool.hatch.build.targets.sdist]
include = ['/tests']

[tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
core-metadata-version = '2.3'
1 Like