# PEP 676: PEP Infrastructure Process **URL:** \ **Category:** PEPs\ **Created:** [September 23, 2021, 12:14am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-676-pep-infrastructure-process/10774 "2021-09-23T00:14:07Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 106
**Author:** ![CAM-Gerlach](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/cam-gerlach/32/3688_2.png) [@CAM-Gerlach](https://discuss.python.org/u/CAM-Gerlach)\ **Post date:** [March 10, 2022, 9:12am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-676-pep-infrastructure-process/10774/106 "2022-03-10T09:12:47Z")
I brought this up earlier; he issue is due to the “system font stack” approach used for the monospaced font, which results in a font that, depending on the platform, OS version, browser and user fonts installed, may or may not match the size of the PEP prose content. Using a standard web font (e.g. Incosolata) would resolve this, as it has a consistent size on every platform, but others favored the “system font stack” approach for other reasons, and thus far the discussion has not reached a resolution: > [@Styling of PEPs](https://discuss.python.org/t/styling-of-peps/13270): > > I think the contrast with the page background is too much for both hyperlinks and inline code background in dark mode --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-676-pep-infrastructure-process/10774)._