# PEP 690: Lazy Imports Again

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-690-lazy-imports-again/19661>\
**Category:** PEPs\
**Created:** [October 3, 2022, 4:09pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-690-lazy-imports-again/19661 "2022-10-03T16:09:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![barry](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/barry/32/42_2.png) [@barry](https://discuss.python.org/u/barry)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2022, 12:53am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-690-lazy-imports-again/19661/32 "2022-12-03T00:53:27Z")

</div>

I appreciate the SC’s reasoned consideration, but I’m also disappointed in the PEP’s rejection. It was the best option so far for solving a common use case, and one that puts pressure on ecosystems to move away from Python.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-690-lazy-imports-again/19661)._