# PEP 723: Embedding pyproject.toml in single-file scripts

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-723-embedding-pyproject-toml-in-single-file-scripts/31151>\
**Category:** Packaging\
**Created:** [August 6, 2023, 6:07pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-723-embedding-pyproject-toml-in-single-file-scripts/31151 "2023-08-06T18:07:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 38

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ofek](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/ofek/32/1033_2.png) [@ofek](https://discuss.python.org/u/ofek)\
**Post date:** [August 8, 2023, 4:48am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-723-embedding-pyproject-toml-in-single-file-scripts/31151/38 "2023-08-08T04:48:43Z")

</div>

I think I have incorporated all of the feedback so far:

- PR: [PEP 723: update based on feedback by ofek · Pull Request #3279 · python/peps · GitHub](https://github.com/python/peps/pull/3279)
- Preview: [PEP 723 – Embedding pyproject.toml in single-file scripts | peps.python.org](https://pep-previews--3279.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0723/)

For any new feedback unrelated to the changes please make that explicit so that I can address that here or in a follow-up PR.

Personally, I am quite content with how the document looks now and do not anticipate much changing other than potentially adding a section that documents what maintainers of various tools have said about this PEP (tomorrow Charlie will comment about Ruff).

@brettcannon, I’m certain that we will be able to meet your deadline of the 14th 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-723-embedding-pyproject-toml-in-single-file-scripts/31151)._