# PEP 729: Typing governance process

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-729-typing-governance-process/35362>\
**Category:** PEPs\
**Created:** [October 4, 2023, 2:23pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-729-typing-governance-process/35362 "2023-10-04T14:23:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![erictraut](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/erictraut/32/15190_2.png) [@erictraut](https://discuss.python.org/u/erictraut)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2023, 8:13pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-729-typing-governance-process/35362/4 "2023-10-13T20:13:04Z")

</div>

I’m also +1 on this proposal. Just to echo what @rchen152 said, having a clearer decision-making structure would be really beneficial to me as a type checker maintainer. A more formal specification and conformance test suite would also be very welcome. This will translate to a better experience for users of the Python type system and related tooling.

Thanks @Jelle & @hauntsaninja for your leadership and all the thought and hard work that went into this proposal.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-729-typing-governance-process/35362)._