# PEP 766: handling multiple indexes (Index Priority)

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-766-handling-multiple-indexes-index-priority/71589>\
**Category:** Standards\
**Tags:** PyPI, pep\
**Created:** [November 18, 2024, 5:16pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-766-handling-multiple-indexes-index-priority/71589 "2024-11-18T17:16:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dhashby](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b2d939/32.png) [@dhashby](https://discuss.python.org/u/dhashby)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2024, 1:29am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-766-handling-multiple-indexes-index-priority/71589/10 "2024-12-05T01:29:07Z")

</div>

I’m curious how [this proposal](https://discuss.python.org/t/virtual-pypi-indexes/73336) would affect your thinking on PEP 766? I feel like the two proposals _could be_ very complementary, but also might drive some changes to how you’d go about implementing certain aspects of 766?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-766-handling-multiple-indexes-index-priority/71589)._