Sorry, this doesn’t work on d.p.o, unless I miss something new.
Yeah, probably it does make sense. I see now no good reasons to restrict number of choices.
Sorry, I don’t think it belongs to that list, at least for two reasons:
- it’s off-topic: poll is about naming of the new (sub?)module, not about the fate of the PEP.
- I don’t think, that polling is a good tool to do technical decisions like accept/reject PEP. We have SC to do this for some good reasons. (Perhaps to accept sometimes unpopular ideas — or reject popular ones).
(Anyway, feel free to start a different poll.)
IMO, this thread is to gather feedback, resolve open issues (hence, the poll), collect arguments for and against the PEP. And so far there are not too much arguments in the second camp: “lets not make things backwards incompatible with very little benefit”. But the PEP does not make things backwards incompatible! — so, this is rather a weak argument, isn’t?