PEP 792: Project status markers in the simple index

[woodruffw (William Woodruff)]

Thanks @miketheman!

@miketheman

unless your intent is to drive the change for contents that live under the project-status specific key via PEP - I think it might be better to allow indexes some flexibility here, but I’m happy with either way.

Yeah, this was the intent – another part of the pre-PEP discussion was whether the PEP here should be normative about which statuses are allowed and their corresponding semantics. @dustin pointed out that the PEP’s value proposition is a lot weaker without specifying those normative requirements, so I’m inclined to keep them in

Ref: Pre-PEP discussion: Project status markers in the Index APIs - #32 by dustin