# PEP 793 – PyModExport: A new entry point for C extension modules

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-793-pymodexport-a-new-entry-point-for-c-extension-modules/93444>\
**Category:** PEPs\
**Created:** [May 27, 2025, 4:55am UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-793-pymodexport-a-new-entry-point-for-c-extension-modules/93444 "2025-05-27T04:55:15Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steve.dower](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/steve.dower/32/56_2.png) [@steve.dower](https://discuss.python.org/u/steve.dower)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2025, 5:00pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-793-pymodexport-a-new-entry-point-for-c-extension-modules/93444/30 "2025-09-29T17:00:01Z")

</div>

> [@da-woods](#):
>
> which can be summarised “this seems like an acceptable amount of disruption to solve a problem that is blocking freethreading+stable ABI”

It’s one part of the solution, it doesn’t solve it yet. My opposition to doing it _now_ is because it’s a non-zero amount of disruption that _doesn’t_ (quite) do what you summarised it as.

(In other words, it’s an amount of disruption now with the promise of more future disruption, and I’d prefer to merely promise future disruption without causing any now.)

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-793-pymodexport-a-new-entry-point-for-c-extension-modules/93444)._