Okay, I guess I understand where you’re coming from now. I still think we need to set the criteria for accepting a JIT, and I assumed this PEP would be that proposal (partly because it talks about goals in the Proposal section, I guess! 
) but after reading your response I took another look at the PEP title and, sure, it’s not actually supposed to be about setting the criteria. To me that still feels like it should be a separate PEP, though, albeit not one the SC explicitly asked for.
I will say, when I read[1] the SC’s request for a PEP for the JIT, I didn’t think we were talking about a PEP for a future JIT, but for the current JIT. If the plans in this PEP for the future JIT were rejected, that still leaves the fate of the current JIT unclear.
and, admittedly, when I helped write ↩︎