# Reconsider the "Users" category?

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/reconsider-the-users-category/3365>\
**Category:** Discourse Feedback\
**Created:** [February 20, 2020, 9:44pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/reconsider-the-users-category/3365 "2020-02-20T21:44:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sumanah](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/sumanah/32/1722_2.png) [@sumanah](https://discuss.python.org/u/sumanah)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2020, 5:32pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/reconsider-the-users-category/3365/24 "2020-03-27T17:32:23Z")

</div>

> [@sumanah](#):
>
> I have now tweaked [the Python.org “Forums” page](https://www.python.org/community/forums/) so that this Discourse is at the bottom of the list, and specifically says it’s more for users of the CPython standard library.

I’ve now removed the link to this Discourse from [Forums | Python.org](https://www.python.org/community/forums/) entirely; I had added it [in mid-February](https://discuss.python.org/t/how-to-keep-content-balanced/3155/2), and perhaps I overstepped by doing that. So now I’ve undone that intervention and will let other people decide whether it ought to be re-added there, and/or on [the Mailing Lists page](https://www.python.org/community/lists/), and what wording to use to appropriately set expectations.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/reconsider-the-users-category/3365)._