Over in a different topic, it was suggested some had:
It’s reasonable to read “reporting to” as a euphemism for “filed a complaint”, but not entirely sure. I invited moving that part of the discussion to this topic, but that was 9 days ago, and no follow-up was made here.
OTOH, neither is there a statement all the claimed violations came from “civilian” reports. I’ve never before seen actual violations modified by so many fuzzy qualifiers, like
- could be seen as
- could be interpreted as
- may be inappropriate
- which is problematic
- may be seen as
In “a real” list of claimed violations, there’s never the slightest wiggle room for the slightest doubt about what’s been claimed. For example, in the two before mine, here and here.