That would be a relief to me, but we can’t know. And due to the peculiarities of the way the suspension was handled (no comms from the CoC WG at all to you), I find it unlikely.
Tim knows this, I’m just relating it for posterity, but I define “civilian” as anyone who is not involved in the SC nor the CoC WG, and I define “report” as a message having been sent to conduct-wg@python.org or to a Board member as per Python Software Foundation Community Member Procedure For Reporting Code of Conduct Incidents - Python Software Foundation Policies . Making it possible to elide the report-gathering step while building a CoC WG recommendation is even more guideline-scoffing, and if the reports came solely from members of the enforcement or recommendation bodies, I’m sure most everyone can see the problem with that.