Shedding light on a three-month suspension

[ambv (Łukasz Langa)]

@mcdonc

That would be a relief to me, but we can’t know. And due to the peculiarities of the way the suspension was handled (no comms from the CoC WG at all to you), I find it unlikely.

The COC WG only works on reports received, it does not proactively look out for things to make recommendations on. This case was no different. I find it disheartening you keep twisting my words to not acknowledge this straightforward explanation.

@tim.one

But there’s more to this: the shrill list of 10 claimed “CoC violations” broadcast to the entire world, and apparently destined to remain on display for the rest of my life.

You let me know on Nov 4th you’d like this redacted and I put this on the agenda for the COC WG to make a decision on. Since then the COC WG had a single meeting on the 15th and this topic didn’t make it to be discussed within the hour allotted for the meeting. There are two meetings per month. The next one is this Friday, the 6th. We will discuss it, I doubt it will be controversial. It just takes time.

@Paddy3118

I just sent the following

The COC WG responded to you:

We acknowledge receipt of your email. The COC WG does not discuss details of cases with third parties. If the reported person wishes to clarify anything, they can reach out to the WG directly.