# Structure of the Packaging Strategy Discussions

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/structure-of-the-packaging-strategy-discussions/23478>\
**Category:** Packaging\
**Created:** [February 3, 2023, 2:03pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/structure-of-the-packaging-strategy-discussions/23478 "2023-02-03T14:03:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pradyunsg](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/pradyunsg/32/206_2.png) [@pradyunsg](https://discuss.python.org/u/pradyunsg)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2023, 1:00pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/structure-of-the-packaging-strategy-discussions/23478/7 "2023-02-11T13:00:29Z")

</div>

> [@rgommers](#):
>
> is this actually planned?

You make an excellent point, and as far as I can tell: No, not at this time.

> [@rgommers](#):
>
> A blog post is unlikely to make a dent here, given the number of topics, types of users, constraints, etc.

Indeed.

> [@rgommers](#):
>
> before diving into strategy threads parts 2 to 5.

Too late for that – we’re already 40 posts into the part 2 discussion ([Python Packaging Strategy Discussion - Part 2](https://discuss.python.org/t/python-packaging-strategy-discussion-part-2/23442)). 😅

* * *

FWIW, the blog post that Shamika mentioned is up: [Python Software Foundation News: Python Packaging Strategy Discussion Summary - Part 1](https://pyfound.blogspot.com/2023/02/python-packaging-strategy-discussion.html) – it certainly doesn’t cover the details to the same extent as I’d hoped it would. 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/structure-of-the-packaging-strategy-discussions/23478)._