# Suspension of Franz Király

**URL:** <https://discuss.python.org/t/suspension-of-franz-kiraly/103776>\
**Category:** PSF\
**Created:** [September 16, 2025, 2:09pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/suspension-of-franz-kiraly/103776 "2025-09-16T14:09:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 95

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ambv](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discuss.python.org/ambv/32/25884_2.png) [@ambv](https://discuss.python.org/u/ambv)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2025, 9:26pm UTC](https://discuss.python.org/t/suspension-of-franz-kiraly/103776/95 "2025-09-30T21:26:16Z")

</div>

> [@tim.one](#):
>
> You, for example, would not have signed off on publicly accusing me of “defending reverse sexism”, not just because you already know it’s something I _wouldn’t_ defend, but because I in fact never even mentioned the topic.

There’s a now [hidden post](https://discuss.python.org/t/im-leaving-too/58408/5) where you are doing exactly that. Hidden posts can’t be seen by forum users anymore as we received many complaints that it was unfair that “only trust level 3 people can see them”. But if I understand correctly, you should be able to see your own hidden post.

In fact, the entire context there is hidden due to a large number of user flags we received from users on that topic, including relevant posts by Karl. Long story short: Karl went on a tirade about how the CoC is immoral due to the “reverse sexism” clause. Somebody objected because [the term is widely understood in context](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_sexism). You went on to defend Karl.

In any case, the moderators stayed off this topic despite a growing number of flags we’re receiving. 1/3 of the posts here are yours, in fact you’re typing right now as I’m finishing this post! The last post currently published is by you as well. I would like to suggest you slow down.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.python.org/t/suspension-of-franz-kiraly/103776)._
