I tried to read into some of the points listed and speaking for myself I started to worry, e.g point one almost gave me an impression the SC and PSF aren’t impressed with controversy or they don’t appreciate that sometimes controversy should be feedback to some of our processes, even if we don’t take everything suggested in the controversy. In another interpretation of this point, this may not be what the SC means by that point of course.
As we discuss this, I want to say, when people give some feedback as many are doing on this thread, this shouldn’t be always equated to the lack of trust. We can trust the SC and PSF as well as give some feedback on certain topics. Trust and constructive criticism can coexist.