Interesting project! I threw a couple of threads at it, one I started and more-or-less recall, and one a PEP that I’ve tuned in and out of. At the moment, I don’t find it very helpful for reorienting myself to the threads. It foregrounds people quoting each other as agreement, and pieces quoted as evidence often use pronouns without antecedents, so it’s difficult to understand what the topic of (dis)agreement even is.
Here are the summaries:
- Kirigami (Summarizing Dynamic versions in editable installations)
- https://www.dpodoesnt.work/topics/106196 (Summarizing PEP 825: Wheel Variants, Package Format (split from PEP 817))
I read the “How it works” and that there’s no LLM involved, which makes me think resolving these issues is likely a significant challenge with traditional NLP (although I’m no expert in the state of the art, modulo LLMs). However, identifying and filtering literal quotes might be a fairly straightforward refinement.