What do you want in Python packaging's future governance model?

Change: Re-frame governance to avoid altogether the idea of being a “member” of anything, or to imply any sort of “official” status.

Effect: Avoids the suggestion that projects are forced to accept the governance model to gain some sort of “legitimacy”. Allows projects to compete on merit, and not because of details of how they are governed (which should be irrelevant to end users). Allows user consensus on the best tool to be what drives adoption, rather than labels like “PyPA member”. Allows projects to fail to achieve popularity, without needing to be removed from the packaging governance model simply to avoid confusing users.