Yeah, true… But I was suggesting that one only reads a few chunks and then calls asyncio.sleep().
Something like:
network.read(CHUNKS)
await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
So that you have some sort of round robin implementation.
Yeah, true… But I was suggesting that one only reads a few chunks and then calls asyncio.sleep().
Something like:
network.read(CHUNKS)
await asyncio.sleep(0.5)
So that you have some sort of round robin implementation.