This is functionality I just enabled on our instance. Should help with PEP review.
Letâs give a shot !
And this is nested !!!
Yes, letâs try it!
And is this?
Is there still a way to sort threads chronologically? I see some long threads with recent replies but itâs not easy to see where exactly the new content is. I used to just scroll to the bottom.
I disabled this by default, because the sorting is very non-obvious.
but thereâs just 3 levels, later it wonât thread further
This reply is nested, and was written about an hour after Nathan wrote this âŚ
⌠and Ĺukasz responded with this âŚ
As we can see, if a reply refers to content from multiple replies that were written earlier, and are nested, the flow of logic can become confusing.
Right, you replied to one comment, and copied other quotes in?
With threads, could you reply to each of the three people separately and directly?
Right! And itâs not just that, the reply sorting doesnât really seem to respect the âSort byâ setting at the top.
This might be a reply to mine, which had been written six minutes earlier. However, mine appears later in the ordering.
So, yes, with this system, we need to quote strategically, so as not to create confusion. Still, if a user reads a long nested thread, thinks about the content, then opts to post a nested reply anywhere, the nested ordering might leave it nonobvious which content informed their thinking.
And is this?
Yes, even for me. Itâs nice to see that the feature preserves the existing threading functionality for mailing list mode, so no real change in my case.
I just saw there was a new post here, opened the thread, and Iâd never have been able to find the new post except for the fact that I noticed your user icon was against the thread in the âUnread itemsâ view, and then I spotted your post.
In a complex discussion, I can guarantee Iâd miss new posts.
Is there any way for unread messages to be highlighted? Because when I used a threaded mail reader (long ago!) it was the fact that unread messages were highlighted that made it possible to navigate.
And what just happened? I replied to @fungi but my post is shown as a reply to @hugovk!!!
Edit: And this post, a reply to my previous one, is shown above my post and not as a reply to it. Is this the âmaximum 3 levels of nestingâ issue that was mentioned earlier?
So far it doesnât seem like an improvement. . .
I donât know if people are familiar with Reddit and the RES extension for it, but one must-have feature for long nested threads that it has is being able to toggle between seeing a full topic and only the new comments in it. So subthreads with no new replies donât show at all in this mode, read parent replies show as grayed and trimmed, and new replies show normally.
I canât imagine following a long-standing thread without a feature like that.
I canât imagine following a long-standing thread without a feature like that.
Same, if my MUA didnât indicate which messages are unread and allow me to easily jump to those within the thread, or toggle visibility for those Iâve already read, Iâd be just as lost.
Itâs a basic feature for E-mail clients (and Usenet newsreaders for that matter), so somewhat surprising to me that people designing a mail-like threading UI wouldnât at least have a passing familiarity with prior art, an interaction model in this case which has evolved and been perfected over the course of a half-century if not longer.