The steering council thinks it’s about time to make a decision on this PEP and our official policy on backwards compatibility. Benjamin has made a couple minor updates at the SC’s request (i.e. updating the PEP for our annual release cadence, having deprecations specify the targeted removal date).
PEP: 387
Title: Backwards Compatibility Policy
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
BDFL-Delegate: Brett Cannon (on behalf of the steering council)
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-387-backwards-compatibilty-policy/
Status: Draft
Type: Process
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 18-Jun-2009
Post-History: 19-Jun-2009, 12-Jun-2020
Abstract
========
This PEP outlines Python's backwards compatibility policy.
Rationale
=========
As one of the most used programming languages today [#tiobe]_, the
Python core language and its standard library play a critical role in
millions of applications and libraries. This is fantastic. However, it
means the development team must be very careful not to break this
existing 3rd party code with new releases.
This PEP takes the perspective that "backwards incompatibility" means
preexisting code ceases to comparatively function after a change. It is
acknowledged that this is not a concrete definition, but the expectation
is people in general understand what is meant by
"backwards incompatibility", and if they are unsure they may ask the
Python development team and/or steering council for guidance.
Backwards Compatibility Rules
=============================
This policy applies to all public APIs. These include:
- Syntax and behavior of these constructs as defined by the reference
manual.
- The C-API.
- Function, class, module, attribute, and method names and types.
- Given a set of arguments, the return value, side effects, and raised
exceptions of a function. This does not preclude changes from
reasonable bug fixes.
- The position and expected types of arguments and returned values.
- Behavior of classes with regards to subclasses: the conditions under
which overridden methods are called.
- Documented exceptions and the semantics which lead to their raising.
- Exceptions commonly raised in EAFP scenarios.
Others are explicitly not part of the public API. They can change or
be removed at any time in any way. These include:
- Function, class, module, attribute, method, and C-API names and
types that are prefixed by "_" (except special names).
- Anything documented publicly as being private.
- Imported modules (unless explicitly documented as part of the public
API; e.g. importing the ``bacon`` module in the ``spam`` does not
automatically mean ``spam.bacon`` is part of the public API unless
it is documented as such).
- Inheritance patterns of internal classes.
- Test suites. (Anything in the ``Lib/test`` directory or test
subdirectories of packages.)
Basic policy for backwards compatibility
----------------------------------------
* In general, incompatibilities should have a large benefit to
breakage ratio, and the incompatibility should be easy to resolve in
affected code. For example, adding an stdlib module with the same
name as a third party package is generally not acceptable. Adding
a method or attribute that conflicts with 3rd party code through
inheritance, however, is likely reasonable.
* Unless it is going through the deprecation process below, the
behavior of an API *must* not change in an incompatible fashion
between any two consecutive releases. Python's yearly release
process (:pep:`602`) means that the deprecation period must last at
least two years.
* Similarly a feature cannot be removed without notice between any two
consecutive releases.
* The steering council may grant exceptions to this policy. In
particular, they may shorten the required deprecation period for a
feature. Exceptions are only granted for extreme situations such as
dangerously broken or insecure features or features no one could
reasonably be depending on (e.g., support for completely obsolete
platforms).
Making Incompatible Changes
===========================
Making an incompatible change is a gradual process performed over
several releases:
1. Discuss the change. Depending on the degree of incompatibility,
this could be on the bug tracker, python-dev, python-list, or the
appropriate SIG. A PEP or similar document may be written.
Hopefully users of the affected API will pipe up to comment.
2. Add a warning. If behavior is changing, the API may gain a new
function or method to perform the new behavior; old usage should
raise the warning. If an API is being removed, simply warn
whenever it is entered. ``DeprecationWarning`` is the usual
warning category to use, but ``PendingDeprecationWarning`` may be
used in special cases were the old and new versions of the API will
coexist for many releases [#warnings]_. Compiler warnings are also
acceptable. The warning message should include the release the
incompatibility is expected to become the default and a link to an
issue that users can post feedback to.
3. Wait for the warning to appear in at least two major Python
versions. It's fine to wait more than two releases.
4. See if there's any feedback. Users not involved in the original
discussions may comment now after seeing the warning. Perhaps
reconsider.
5. The behavior change or feature removal may now be made default or
permanent having reached the declared version. Remove the old
version and warning.
References
==========
.. [#tiobe] TIOBE Programming Community Index
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
.. [#warnings] The warnings module
http://docs.python.org/library/warnings.html
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
coding: utf-8
End: