Proposal: new section for package announcement

I propose to create a specific session like Ideas, but for all new packages published to pypi, conda or another third party source, like announcements of Rust forum:

I passed very much time on internet to search a packages to not reinventing the wheel and then found after hours.

In Rust forum that’s easy, thanks to announcements section.


1 Like

I’m a little confused—could you explain more how this would make it easier to find packages vs. just searching PyPI, GitHub, other existing forums, or everything at once with Google? Seems like those would be much more convenient, direct and comprehensive options vs. going to a forum/Discourse and searching there for the small fraction of package authors who would cross-post their release announcements here. Furthermore, to me it seems likely to easily get overrun with spam and novelty/vanity packages if it does pick up traction. But maybe there’s something I’m missing here?

PyPI has an RSS feed exactly for newly published packages:

See Feeds - Warehouse documentation for more details


Thanks for this suggestion! I missing it!
But at this point I would receive all the packages published by mail…it seems a bit too much.

Let me explain my request:

When I search on google a python package (but it also happens for other languages, like Go and Rust, which are the last languages ​​I’m using besides Python :-)), I’m presented with a page that Google thinks is better for my search . I’ll give a practical example.

One of the latest projects I’ve been working on, has a graphql backend.
If I search “python graphql” on Google, various search items appear, but one of the first is the official GraphQL site, where I immediately notice the bindings for my language:

Perfect! They are sorted by number of stars on Github. Now I do a comparison on Pypi and notice a package level discrepancy.

I don’t know what to choose because I don’t have any user experience with these libraries and above all I don’t have satisfactory documentation in some packages to avoid running into semantic programming bugs.

I decide to change language. I do a quick search on the official Go forum. I find the most used package with links to documentation and user experiences.

I do the same thing for Rust. I find the same things here too.

Here, it would be nice if everyone, as also happens in the other forums, could publish their work and the users of a specific forum of the language like this, could tell their experience with that package, extend the official documentation, publish their projects or examples based on such packages.
At that point, you have only one research point and you would find the right package for you, in a few minutes of research.

@CAM-Gerlach, for my graphql project I spent a week googling and pypi researching, spending hours installing, understanding, studying and implementing packages. Also, in python no nosql database packages have the same interface. Everyone does what they like, something that doesn’t happen in other languages…but that’s another thing and I’ve already opened a discussion on this forum.
If you had an announcements session, you would have a single point of to find with feedback from people who can tell you about their experience.
Open source is also based on this, if we consider source == ideas.

I hope I explained myself better.
Anyway, thanks for your feedback!

Thanks for sharing the detailed info. I think it sounds a bit like yelp reviews/discussions but for Python packages on PyPI :slight_smile:

I can definitely see how such a forum could be useful and make it easier for the users to find and choose packages, but only if used properly :slight_smile:

We already have a central place of discovery of packages (i.e. the PyPI RSS).
The discussions and feedback about each package are probably already happening on each of the project’s GitHub repo, issue tracker, and GitHub Discussions, just not on a central place.

While such a central place could be useful, it will also adds burden to the forum moderators, so I’m not sure if it’s worth the effort.


I search for Python packages by going to
and entering keywords in the search field, eg “graphql”.
The results for that are here: Search results · PyPI

In fact I do this often enough that in my browser (firefox) I’ve made a
“pypi” keyword search, and can just type pypi graphql in the
location/url bar to perform that search.

My point here is that using a general purpose search engine like Google
to find language specific packages when that language already has a
central place indexing packages is less effective than using the search
at the central place ( in this case).

Playing “guess the useful package keyword” with a general purpose search
engine such as Google or DuckDuckGo is tedious and frustrating.

My personal opinion is that having a forum category for “new package
posted” may be nice for people who want it, but not generally useful.
There are currently 417,534 packages on PyPI, with 3,965,298 releases.
That’s a lot to keep abreast of in a forum.

Cameron Simpson

1 Like

You don’t seem to be aware of the comp.lang.python.announce newsgroup or corresponding mailing list

This is meant for Python related announcements and often used for package announcements.

Note that this is different from an RSS feed on PyPI, since it only gets announcements for which the author wrote an announcement email.

Some additional leads:

  • provides more insight into popularity of a package based on various statistics
  • Download numbers are available on e.g. PePy or using
  • StackOverflow will typically have some suggestions and allows you to get a quick overview of any issues a package may have
  • The web is full of blog entries with reviews or suggestions for Python packages
  • Python conferences and their talk archives/videos are a great way to learn about new technology