More reaction options?

Sometimes I appreciate a post but the :heart: doesn’t feel right and I’d like to :+1: but that’s not available and I end up doing nothing. Sad.

How about adding some more options? There’s an official Discourse plugin for that:

5 Likes

I just treat :heart: like a :+1:, particularly if I agree (eg to some
comment on one of my posts) but have no salient further commentry.

1 Like

What if you disagree? That might be where I’d use :+1: most. When I want to acknowledge a good argument or effort, but disagree with the goal or significance of the argument and don’t want to endorse it. A :heart: feels too strong then.

But no one will ever interpret it that way :joy:

1 Like

Yes, I’ve been in this situation as well. And I would rather use :+1: to
indicate, um, approval instead of a :heart:.

OTOH, I’m very -1 on a :-1:. Too easy to abuse.

2 Likes

So you’re meta-:-1:

3 Likes

In that I think having a lot of available reactions is a can of worms leading to a rabbit hole to a pit of darkness. In particular I’m against negative reactions. I think the only way to keep a forum welcoming is for disagreement to be explained clearly and, ideally, dispassionately instead of being an opaque button click.

5 Likes

Necroing this, but what about if we enabled the plugin but only enabled the non-negative reactions, or even just :heart: and :+1: ? Alternatively, if we just want :+1: , we could at least in theory replace the :heart: with the :+1: in the UI with some CSS hacks.

2 Likes

I first want to concur that adding :-1: is a very bad idea, for all the reasons others have said.

I’m still -0 on adding :+1:, because

according to this, a :+1: can be used as a soft disapproval. It comes off to me as being passive aggressive.

Also, adding :+1: may ruin :heart:. Right now I don’t see anything wrong with it: github has :star:, some other platforms have :+1:, and we have :heart:. It’s just a generic positive reaction, it doesn’t mean any more than that. But if we have both :+1: and :heart:, the latter will take on a new meaning as a strong positive reaction. This may lead to some uncomfortable situations.

These are just my speculations (that’s why I’m only -0 against it), and maybe I’m just overthinking it, but I don’t even want to open these possibilities.

I would be +0 on replacing :heart: with :+1:.

That wouldn’t be new. It already is strong. That’s why I asked for this in the first place - because I’d like something not so strong. A heart is not “just a generic positive reaction”. It’s a symbol for love, thus coming across as “I’m loving this”.

1 Like

Your interpretation is not universally agreed upon, though. I don’t think most people are interpreting the :heart: on their post as “wow, they LOVE it!”

2 Likes